- Mandy's World
- Posts
- Why Post-Labor Economics Should Be on Every Investor's Radar
Why Post-Labor Economics Should Be on Every Investor's Radar
(And Why I'm Already Positioning for It)

I just spent one hour listening to what might be the most important economic framework for the next decade, and I can't stop thinking about its implications for my investment strategy. David Shapiro's conversation on the Women Talk About AI podcast about post-labor economics isn't just another AI hype piece. It's a sobering analysis of why everything we know about work, money, and human value is about to fundamentally change.
As someone who has already transitioned from a decade in banking to exploring the intersection of finance and AI while building a crypto portfolio designed for long-term independence, I realize I've been unconsciously preparing for exactly the future Shapiro describes.
The Great Decoupling: When GDP No Longer Needs Us
Shapiro's central thesis hit me like a lightning bolt. We're witnessing the decoupling of economic productivity from human labor. This isn't about robots taking some jobs. It's about the end of the job paradigm itself. Think about it. In 1800, 75 percent of Americans were farmers. Today, only 2 percent are, yet we produce vastly more food. Manufacturing employment halved since 1979, but output tripled. This pattern is now accelerating exponentially with AI.
What struck me most was Shapiro's breakdown of the four human economic offerings. Strength was automated away with steam engines. Dexterity is being automated with robotics and is currently in progress. Cognition is being automated with AI and is happening now. Empathy is the last human refuge, but then what? There is no fifth paradigm. Let that sink in.
The Timeline That Should Terrify or Motivate Every Professional
Here's what made me sit up straight. Only 20 percent of Fortune 500 companies officially use generative AI today. By 2028, 70 to 80 percent adoption is projected. By 2030 to 2032, 90 to 95 percent saturation is expected. AI capabilities are doubling every 4 to 7 months. Math as a domain is almost solved, with 95 percent or more on benchmarks. Microsoft just released a report showing the top 40 AI-exposed jobs. The pattern is "language in, language out." If your job primarily involves processing and producing language, whether written or spoken, there's no technical reason AI can't do it already. Only institutional inertia is slowing implementation.
The Power Problem: Why This Time Really Is Different
Here's where Shapiro's historical analysis becomes chilling. Throughout history, when labor becomes cheap, human life becomes cheap. The only exception is when labor becomes scarce. The Black Death, horrific as it was, led directly to democratic reforms because suddenly workers had leverage. They were scarce. Today, we're heading in the opposite direction. As Shapiro puts it, "Strike all you want. We'll just replace you with machines." This isn't fear-mongering. It's already happening. The proposed solution, that we'll all become prompt engineers or AI supervisors, ignores the exponential improvement in AI autonomy.
The Investment Implications: From Wage-Based to Asset-Based Survival
This is where my banker brain kicked into overdrive. Shapiro proposes two critical new metrics. The first is the Economic Agency Index, which is the ratio of household income from wages versus property versus government transfers. The second is the Inclusive Capital Income Ratio, which measures how much of median household income comes from capital ownership.
Currently, most places hover at 6 percent or less on the inclusive capital ratio. Shapiro wants to see 50 to 70 percent. That means most people need to derive most of their income from owning things that generate value, not from selling their time.
My Personal Strategy: Building an Ark Before the Flood
Listening to this, I realized my investment approach over the past years has unconsciously been preparing for exactly this scenario. Crypto as post-labor capital. My holdings aren't just speculative assets. They're stakes in the infrastructure of a new economy. In a world where traditional employment collapses, owning pieces of the decentralized financial system becomes crucial. Shapiro mentions property-based income strategies. Go and research what solutions may fit for you! Not for fun, greed or whatever, but for survival in a post-wage world.
AI-enhanced decision making. I'm using AI not just as a tool, but as a leverage multiplier for strategic decisions. While others fear AI, I'm learning to dance with it because those who can orchestrate AI, not just use it, will thrive.
Next, geographic arbitrage preparation. Shapiro notes different nations will adapt differently. I will definitely research into location-independent living when the time comes.
The Mindset Shift: From River to Garden
Perhaps the most profound part of Shapiro's framework is his metaphor of life as a garden rather than a river. The "river" mentality (school, job, marriage, house, retirement) assumes linear progression toward a destination. The "garden" mentality means continuously cultivating different areas of life without a fixed endpoint.
As someone who left traditional banking after finally accepting the fact that it’s not for me, who's exploring creative projects while building investment strategies, who's learning to find meaning beyond conventional success metrics, I'm already living this garden life. (At least I’m getting closer!) Not by choice initially, but by necessity. Now I see it might be the only sustainable approach.
The Uncomfortable Truth About Status Games
Shapiro references "The Status Game" by Will Storr, noting that humans are neurologically wired for status competition. It's older than money, older than civilization. When work-based status disappears, we won't stop playing status games. We'll just find new rules. This is already visible in movements like "lying flat" in China or "bedrotting" in the West. Young people are opting out not from laziness, but as rebellion against a game they can't win. The collapse in birth rates is another form of unconscious economic withdrawal.
What This Means for You (And Why You Should Care)
If you're reading this thinking "I'll just learn AI and stay relevant," you're missing the point. This isn't about individual adaptation. It's about systemic transformation. Shapiro's framework suggests we need universal basic capital, not just income. Everyone needs ownership stakes. We need new metrics for economic success beyond GDP, blockchain-based democracy to prevent complete power concentration, and education focused on curiosity, not job preparation.
Governments typically act when unemployment hits 11 to 14 percent. We're not there yet. But by the time we are, it might be too late for individuals to position themselves...
My Call to Action (And Yours)
I'm not writing this to spread doom, I'm writing it because I think understanding these dynamics early is the difference between thriving and merely surviving in the coming transition. So here's what I'm doing: I'm building capital assets such as crypto, stocks, and gold/silver. I'm developing AI orchestration skills, not just prompting. I'm creating content and IP like books and blogs, which are assets that could generate value. I'm always curious and try to learn new things, tracking the metrics that matter, such as property income ratio, not just net worth.
The Final Paradox
The bitter irony is that those of us anxious about AI replacing our jobs might be the lucky ones. We're preparing. It's the confidently employed, those who believe their jobs are "AI-proof," who might face the rudest awakening.. As Shapiro notes, we're living through the fourth industrial revolution, and they're accelerating. The first took 150 years. The second took 70 to 90. The third took 40 to 50. This one might be over in 20.
The question isn't whether post-labor economics will arrive. It's whether you'll own assets when it does or whether you'll be dependent on whatever universal basic income governments eventually, reluctantly provide.
I know which side of that divide I plan to be on. The real question is, do you?
What are your thoughts on this topic, post-labor economics? How are you preparing for a world where traditional employment might become obsolete? Feel free to reach me on X and and share your strategies. We need collective intelligence to navigate this transition.
Key Takeaways for Investors:
Shift focus from income generation to asset accumulation. Prioritize ownership of automated and digital infrastructure such as crypto and AI stocks. Develop skills in AI orchestration, not just AI usage. Build multiple income streams, especially passive ones. Question traditional investment advice based on employment assumptions. Consider geographic diversification for economic resilience. Remember, the goal isn't to get rich. It's to remain economically relevant in a post-labor world!
What I saw today:
Here’s the video I watched! Highly recommend!
What I listened to today:
What I liked today:
A Taxonomy of LLM Halucinations
Large Language Models have transformed how we interact with artificial intelligence, yet their tendency to generate plausible but factually incorrect content—known as "hallucination"—remains one of the most critical challenges in AI deployment.
— Carlos E. Perez (@IntuitMachine)
5:50 PM • Aug 7, 2025
That’s it for today! ☺️
Disclaimer:
This blog reflects my personal learning journey and experiments with technology. These are my own experiences and observations as I explore the fascinating world of tech and AI.
Developed with research, image generation and writing assistance using AI.
Reply